Skip to main content

Calvinist Worldview

 The recent topic is Deconstructing Christianity. "Push hard on your faith and question everything."

But only do this, says Calvinist Alisa Childers, if you're not looking for objective truth.   Post-modernism says that if objective truth exists, it can't be known - especially when it comes to the areas of morality and religion.


So if those kinds of truths can't be know, but the Christian comes across with claims to know the truth about things like Heaven and hell, they look like they are engaged in a power grab, or controlling through fear.  


The claim is that Deconstruction is about removing toxic beliefs, the beliefs that are oppressive to me.  But this exploration is framed in terms of how things affect the individual.  So it appears very subjective - that rule doesn't both you, but it bothers me.

 

But here is where things begin to become shady.   

"If we are just trusting our own internal moral compasses, first of all we're assuming that what we're going to be finding inside our own hearts is going to be something good.  And as Christians, we know that there is something broken in us, it's called fallen nature.  We have a sin nature that we inherited.  So we're not always going to have it right what is going to be good for us, or bad for us.

"We all have the Holy Spirit who is convicting us of our sin. and we're having to repent and turn from our sin every day in our process of sanctification."


Two things are happening here.  The first is a perfect encapsulation of the  reformation of Augustine, the major innovation that he brought to Christianity.  Prior to his  discussion, Christianity focused on personal moral responsibility.  Each of us was charged with doing good and being good, and we were given libertarian moral free will to accomplish this monumental task, along with the teaching of the scripture and the guidance provided by the indwelling Holy Spirit.  What Augustine said was that because of our fallen nature, our curse that caused an irredeemable sin nature to forever blind us, individuals were not able to make proper moral choices.  Because you have a sin nature, you aren't equipped to make moral choices.  Instead, you need to rely on a cleric hierarchy and a system of rituals and sacraments to ensure your proper standing with God.

What then of the role of the Holy Spirit, to perfect your sanctification?  The Holy Spirit's role is now only to convict us of our sin by pricking our conscience.  Don't even try to make moral choices, because it's impossible.  Even after you've accepted the gift of salvation, your moral compass remains broken by "the curse".  What you need is a professional clergy, and a system of rituals administered by specially identified priests, and creeds to recite and the whole trappings of religiosity.

Because of this, you shouldn't ever question your faith.  You don't have the qualifications for intellectual inquiry because of your fallen moral nature.  Remember that you are cursed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Story of Prestor John

 Prestor John was a largely medieval invention, a figure taken from Biblical beginnings and then elevated beyond proportions to a mythic hero that would save Christendom. The story of Prestor John takes place in two parts. The first part begins in the Apostolic age, in the Gospel of John.  In John 21, Jesus has been telling Peter that he should prepare for a martyr's death.  Peter then asked about John, who was the author relating the story. In verse 22, Jesus answered, “If I want him to remain until I return, what is that to you? You follow Me!” 23 Because of this, the rumor spread among the brothers that this disciple would not die. However, Jesus did not say that he would not die, but only, “If I want him to remain until I return, what is that to you?”  The apostle John seems to write to dispel a rumor that Jesus told him he would not die until Jesus returned.  In fact, though many of the apostles were martyred for Christianity, John himself was not a mart...

Tom Wadsworth - The Early Church Didn't have Worship Services

Why the Early Church Didn't Have Worship Services  Origen, ca 230 AD.  "We object to building altars, statues, and temples because we have learned from Jesus Christ the true way of serving God." Wadsworth's thesis is that modern Christianity has changed from the original practices of the Early Church.  We have adopted the communion sacrament as a "sacrifice", that takes place on an Altar, officiated by the pastor, who is now a Priest.  And all of this happens within a dedicated church building that is the modern equivalent of a Temple, with its sanctuary.  Rather than edifying our fellow believers in Early Church Assemblies, we now gather in these temples to participate in a "worship service." He says that Christianity, through its history, has in effect re-created the temple practices of historic Judaism. Irenaeus:  We make an offering to God of the bread and the cup of blessing.  And then when we have perfected the offering, we invoke the Holy Sp...

How were the Gospels written: mere speculation

 Let's start by setting the stage for the Early Church.  In the mid 30s AD, Jesus was crucified by the Romans.   Jesus was resurrected and appeared to many people, including his disciples.  This happened both in Jerusalem and in Galilee, on the road to Emmaus and elsewhere. Peter preached his message in Jerusalem at the day of Pentecost.  From there, new Jewish/ Christian believers dispersed to their home towns including Antioch, Ephesus, Rome. Peter remained a prominent leader in the Jerusalem church, along with James the Lord's brother and, interestingly, accompanied by John Mark.  Tradition tells us that other of the apostles embarked on missionary journeys.  For example, Phillip met the Ethiopian and traveled to north Africa.   Matthew was said by Papias (the Bishop of Hieropolis in Phrygia ca. AD 130) to have written the Oracles or Saying of Jesus in his native Aramaic.  This was probably a work in progress during the time he ...